Monday, August 23, 2010

Week 6 - 2D

24/08/2010, Week 6 – 2D

Went through last weeks homework and Sarah showed us her 2D design concepts on a fashion pamphlet about shoes. she went through and explained the assumptions, challenges and refinements. I'm looking forward to see what she comes up with.

Group Exercise - Still waiting on everyone's scores!!

Carol – design industry

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 7, 6, 6, 6, 6 = 6.2

2. Immediate visual appeal – 5, 6, 4, 4, 10 = 5.8

3. Cross generational appeal – 4, 4, 2, 3, 7 = 4

4. Suitability for print – 3, 5, 6, 5, 8 = 5.4

5. Suitability for web – 8, 7, 10, 6, 10 = 8.2

6. Monochromatic suitability – 0, 3, 3, 1, 5 = 2.4

7. Simplicity – 4, 4, 1, 2, 5 = 3.2

Carol – non profit

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 6

2. Immediate visual appeal - 7

3. Cross generational appeal - 6

4. Suitability for print - 7

5. Suitability for web - 7

6. Monochromatic suitability - 4

7. Simplicity - 5

Sarah – design industry

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 9

2. Immediate visual appeal - 8

3. Cross generational appeal - 8

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 10

6. Monochromatic suitability - 10

7. Simplicity - 10

Sarah – non profit

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 9

2. Immediate visual appeal - 9

3. Cross generational appeal - 8

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 10

6. Monochromatic suitability - 9

7. Simplicity - 8

Teddy – design industry

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 8

2. Immediate visual appeal - 7

3. Cross generational appeal - 7

4. Suitability for print - 9

5. Suitability for web - 9

6. Monochromatic suitability - 9

7. Simplicity - 8

Teddy– non profit

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 8

2. Immediate visual appeal - 7

3. Cross generational appeal - 7

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 9

6. Monochromatic suitability - 9

7. Simplicity - 8

Zac – design industry

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 9

2. Immediate visual appeal - 9

3. Cross generational appeal - 8

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 10

6. Monochromatic suitability - 8

7. Simplicity - 8

Zac – non profit

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 9

2. Immediate visual appeal - 8

3. Cross generational appeal - 7

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 9

6. Monochromatic suitability - 10

7. Simplicity - 9

And Mine

Stevie – design industry (Middle Picture)

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 9

2. Immediate visual appeal - 9

3. Cross generational appeal - 8

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 9

6. Monochromatic suitability - 7

7. Simplicity - 8

Stevie – non profit (Bottom Picture)

1. Accuracy in addressing the brief - 9

2. Immediate visual appeal - 7

3. Cross generational appeal - 7

4. Suitability for print - 10

5. Suitability for web - 9

6. Monochromatic suitability - 6

7. Simplicity - 7


I think my designs are simple but effective because the name stands out and the graphics also help to explain the name. growth was the main factor i was going for as we are uni students and we are growing to become what we want to be as a person. A flower i think describes growth in the best way as it starts off as a small like bud and gradually blossoms into a beautiful flower as it shows its self off to the world. be the best you can be.!

1 comment:

  1. Very good design work here - I really like the "growing knowledge" logo.

    It is not clear to me which is the "design Industry client" logo and which is the "non-profit arts organization". Please use labels to make it clear.

    Aha - just spotted your reference in the scores - what happens if somebody is not interested in the scores and they just look at the designs?

    "John Maeda: ORGANIZE" ....use labels / use labels / use labels / am i repeating myself ? / am i repeating myself ? / am i repeating myself ? /

    ReplyDelete